moodLearning Wiki

Trace: › uploading-users-in-moodle › deployment-steps-library-in-a-box › peoplesuite › moocswo-net › test-takers-code-of-ethics › teachers-guide-my-etraining-setup › sample-lms-features-scenarios

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
interpreting-mlap-results [2020/08/13 01:14]
serbizadmin 		interpreting-mlap-results [2020/09/09 02:14] (current)
serbizadmin [Word Cloud]
Line 14: Line 14:
 [{{ ::readability-score.png?nolink&600 |Readability Scores via mLaP Stand-Alone}}] [{{ ::readability-score.png?nolink&600 |Readability Scores via mLaP Stand-Alone}}]
 \\ \\
-So, the relevant question in relation to plagiarism might be, is this particular document submission consistent with the readability of the submitter's previous submissions? Is the piece's readability related to the readability of its sources (Roig 2001; Sun 2012; Torres & Roig 2005)? One study, for example, found that “incidences of potential plagiarism such as exact copying and near copying appeared to be higher for the low-readability text (33%) than the high-readability text (11.2%)” (Sun 2012: 302). Did the document submitters simply use paraphrasing tools (like [[https://paraphrasing-tool.com/|this]] and [[https://www.prepostseo.com/paraphrasing-tool|that]]) mechanically without making the texts truly "their own"?+So, the relevant question in relation to plagiarism might be, is this particular document submission consistent with the readability of the submitter's previous submissions? Is the piece's readability related to the readability of its sources (Roig 2001; Sun 2012; Torres & Roig 2005)? One study, for example, found that “incidences of potential plagiarism such as exact copying and near copying appeared to be higher for the low-readability text (33%) than the high-readability text (11.2%)” (Sun 2012: 302). \\ \\ 
 +Did the document submitters simply use paraphrasing tools (like [[https://paraphrasing-tool.com/|this]] and [[https://www.prepostseo.com/paraphrasing-tool|that]]) mechanically without making the texts truly "their own"? Paraphrasing is likely in plagiarism involving less-readable sources. A paraphrasing engine might have been used.
  
 === Which Readability Test? === === Which Readability Test? ===
Line 27: Line 28:
 \\ \\
 ====Word Cloud ==== ====Word Cloud ====
-A word cloud highlight words or concepts prominent in the document. Their font sizes are relative to their prominence vis-a-vis other words or concepts in the text. \\ \\+A word cloud highlights words or concepts prominent in the document. Their font sizes are relative to their prominence vis-a-vis other words or concepts in the text. \\ \\
 {{ ::word-cloud-mlap.png?nolink&600 |}} {{ ::word-cloud-mlap.png?nolink&600 |}}
 \\ \\
 ====Word Count==== ====Word Count====
-Based on the total number of words, one may estimate how long it takes for an average person to read the piece, at the rate of about 130 words per minute. Similarly, the number of minutes or hours it takes for an average writer to write such piece may also be estimated. Has the submission been written too fast, too good to be true? It probably is. \\+Based on the total number of words, one may estimate how long it takes for an average person to read the piece, at the rate of about 130 words per minute. Similarly, the number of minutes or hours it takes for an average writer to write such piece may also be estimated. Has the submission been too fast, too good to be true? It probably is. \\ \\
 {{ ::word-count.png?nolink&600 |}} {{ ::word-count.png?nolink&600 |}}
  
Last modified: 2020/08/13 01:14