moodLearning Wiki

Trace:

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
interpreting-mlap-results [2020/07/22 09:22]
serbizadmin [Contextual Info] 		interpreting-mlap-results [2020/07/22 09:32]
serbizadmin [References]
Line 7: Line 7:
 \\ \\
 =====Contextual Info ===== =====Contextual Info =====
-In certain cases, determining whether the submitted document is plagiarized may require certain contextual information including its readability, whether it's answering the topic head on, or whether submitter might have worked on the document rather "too quickly" (given the allotted time). Below are some of the tools (readability, word cloud, word statistics) we thrown in for teachers and evaluators to use as background contextual info. These tools are integrated in the mLaP service.+In certain cases, determining whether the submitted document is plagiarized may require certain contextual information, like info on its readability, whether the document is dealing with the topic head on, or whether the submitter might have worked on the document rather "too quickly" (given the allotted time). Below are some of the tools (readability, word cloud, other word statistics) we thrown in for teachers and evaluators to use as background contextual info. These tools are integrated in the mLaP service.
  
 ====Readability ==== ====Readability ====
Line 32: Line 32:
 ---- ----
 \\ \\
-=====References =====+=====Selected References =====
 Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_8 Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_8
  
Last modified: 2020/09/09 02:14