Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
Next revision
Both sides next revision
|
interpreting-mlap-results [2020/07/04 23:29]
serbizadmin [Readability] |
interpreting-mlap-results [2020/07/04 23:34]
serbizadmin [Readability] |
| [{{ ::readability-score.png?nolink&600 |Readability Scores via mLaP Stand-Alone}}] | [{{ ::readability-score.png?nolink&600 |Readability Scores via mLaP Stand-Alone}}] |
| \\ | \\ |
| So, the relevant question in relation to plagiarism might be, is this particular document submission consistent with the readability of the submitter's previous submissions? Is the piece's readability related to the readability of its sources (Roig 2001; Sun 2012; Torres & Roig 2005)? In one study, for example, “incidences of potential plagiarism such as exact copying and near copying appeared to be higher for the low-readability text (33%) than the high-readability text (11.2%)” (Sun 2012: 302). Did the document submitters simply use paraphrasing tools (like [[https://paraphrasing-tool.com/|this]] and [[https://www.prepostseo.com/paraphrasing-tool|that]]) mechanically without making the texts truly "their own"? | So, the relevant question in relation to plagiarism might be, is this particular document submission consistent with the readability of the submitter's previous submissions? Is the piece's readability related to the readability of its sources (Roig 2001; Sun 2012; Torres & Roig 2005)? One study, for example, found that “incidences of potential plagiarism such as exact copying and near copying appeared to be higher for the low-readability text (33%) than the high-readability text (11.2%)” (Sun 2012: 302). Did the document submitters simply use paraphrasing tools (like [[https://paraphrasing-tool.com/|this]] and [[https://www.prepostseo.com/paraphrasing-tool|that]]) mechanically without making the texts truly "their own"? |
| |
| ==== Which Readability Test? ==== | ==== Which Readability Test? ==== |